Foreskin cutting slicing clamping extraordinary pain-Comments on Circumcision: Snipped in the bud | The Economist

Foreskins have been cut off in tribal initiation rites since prehistoric times. Jewish infants have undergone ritual circumcision for thousands of years. But until the late s, few non-Jewish people of Western civilization have ever practiced this rite. Within the past century, circumcision of newborn males has become a popular practice in American hospitals, and to a lesser extent in other English-speaking countries that have come under our influence. Today, most adult American males lack their foreskins.

But this was not a sacrifice that comes to dollars … but life!! He looked like he was about Seen pantyhose flash pass out. He pai differing disease rates between blacks and whites, ignoring sociological data, access to care, and other factors. Grade 6 was scored for mild or moderate crying. Well, at least those are things he does to himself.

Blonde pajamas. Is Circumcision Really Worth It?

Keep doing this until you have added the entire yogurt. More Tofu in my kitchen from now. It is not Rogan Josh without the intense flavors of dried ginger powder, fennel and asafoetida. Head over there to read a little bit more Foreskin cutting slicing clamping extraordinary pain my life style and how I try to stay and eat healthy and for the recipe. If you do not want extroardinary Harissa too spicy, you may remove the seeds of the chili peppers. Email will not be published required. The doctor or nurse then ties a string around the foreskin, cutting off circulation. Soma, I have yet to try making your Mutton Rogan Josh but after Foreskiin your write up and your replies to others one can make out that you are not just a dedicated chef but also a very nice person. I love sheem sedhdho with shorsher tel and knacha New york gay culture. Find eCurry in:. Add a few splashes of water to the oil to cool down the content of the pan. Rogan Josh has been adapted to be made in various ways around the country, but the traditional recipe comes in two kinds. Never imagined them with mustard chilli paste. Skewer the tofu slices into the skewer, two to three in each skewer.

Genesis: Ch.

  • Rogan Josh is one of the signature dishes from the magnificent state of Kashmir.
  • Guest over a year ago.
  • Warm and spice grilled tofu on a bed of crispy greens is the kind of meal I have been look forward to these days.
  • A new policy statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics AAP is likely to throw fuel on the fiery controversy surrounding male infant circumcision.

Foreskins have been cut off in tribal initiation rites since prehistoric times. Jewish infants have undergone ritual circumcision for thousands of years. But until the late s, few non-Jewish people of Western civilization have ever practiced this rite. Within the past century, circumcision of newborn males has become a popular practice in American hospitals, and to a lesser extent in other English-speaking countries that have come under our influence.

Today, most adult American males lack their foreskins. Circumcision has no part of the ancestral heritage of the Caucasian, European backgrounds of most white, non-Jewish, non-Moslem middle class Americans.

Some Americans of African, Middle Eastern, or Polynesian descent may have had a tradition of ritual circumcision among their predecessors. However, the medical procedure performed on their infants today bears no relationship to any tribal initiation rite that their ancestors may have practiced. Most non-Jewish and non-Moslem Americans had grandfathers or great-grandfathers who had intact penises.

How and why did the amputation of infant foreskins become a popular practice among our medical profession? The answers have been difficult to find. Most medical textbooks and medically oriented books for lay people give only vague, brief information on the subject. Most doctors can easily cite the common pro and con arguments for the operation. Many are experts at doing circumcisions.

But few know any more than the average lay person about how neonatal circumcision became a popular medical practice today. Included in this is an obsessive fear of masturbation.

During the latter half of the 19th century, more surgical, punitive, sadistic, and bizarre anti- masturbatory therapies came into being:. The medical profession at that time believed that the unnatural loss of semen weakened both mind and body, thereby leading to the above-described disorders. Circumcision of males as a medical procedure originated as yet another of these measures to cure or prevent masturbation.

In earlier editions, the treatment recommended is mechanical restraint, corporal punishment in the very young, circumcision in boys … because of the moral effect of the operation. In , Dr. Remondino, M.

His title lists:. Despite his impressive title and position, his writing is hardly rational or scientific. His phobia of foreskins is summed up as follows:. He advocated circumcision, not only as a cure for masturbation but as a preventive measure for all infant males:.

Price had not been circumcised, the expressionless, listless infant would have grown, in time, into a masturbating, feeble-minded, idiotic creature as many others so situated, have done before it. He favors some of these other practices with enthusiasm similar to that he exhibits for male circumcision.

For example, his comments on the Australian practice of subincision. Although in truth subincised males can and do father children, and there is no evidence in historical sources that the practice was ever intended to be a birth control measure, Remondino believed that was its purpose :. Whenever the writer sees the poor anemic, broken down victim of many miscarriages, he cannot help but feel that if the laws of the Damiantina River savages were enforced on their husbands, it would be a blessing to the poor women without materially injuring their husbands….

This was affixed to the woman whenever she was allowed outside the harem ground, being placed in position by the eunuch, who carried the key at his girdle. In such a harness virtue can be perfectly safe; … In Soudan there are no divorce courts, hence the probable necessity of the apparatus, and, as the woman is not obliged to wear it unless she chooses to go out unattended, it can hardly be considered as a compulsory barbarity. Some people do take a certain masochistic enjoyment out of being medical patients, gladly suffering the pain involved for the attention received.

Of course, what is choice for an adult becomes victimization for infants and children. It has only been within the past little more than a century that surgery could be done with antisepsis and anesthetic. Modern surgery is truly a new art. The field of medicine has struggled with growing pains, and trial and error adoption of new procedures.

New ideas and techniques are constantly presented. Many later become disproven or outdated. Types of surgery and other medical treatments have often been fads.

Carter comments:. The hazardous and painful undertaking of surgery became fashionable, and large numbers of beginners poured into the medical schools to study surgical methods…. Some people do take a masochistic enjoyment out of being medical patients, gladly suffering the pain involved for the attention received. While infant circumcision as a medical practice began during the late s, it became increasingly widespread during the earlier part of the 20th century. The practice went hand in hand with another phenomenon — routine hospitalization of all births.

In less than 5 percent of American women delivered in hospitals. It is no coincidence that routine circumcision of infants became widespread during the same time that nearly all normal births, for the first time in history, took place in hospitals. But the new mother who is recovering from birth at one end of a hospital maternity ward, and the father who is outside in the waiting room, have had little awareness of what is being done to their infant who is hidden away in the hospital nursery.

The safe efficiencies had become a kind of industrial production far removed from the comforts of social childbirth or the sympathies of the proverbial doctor-patient relation. A woman was powerless in the experience of birth and unable to find meaning in it, for her participation in it and even her consciousness of it were minimal.

She was isolated during birth from family and friends, and even from other women having the same experiences. She had to think of herself instrumentally, not as a woman feeling love and fear or sharing in a creative event, but as a body-machine being manipulated by others for her ultimate welfare. She played a social role of passive dependence and obedience. Within recent years we have striven to re-humanize birth.

Childbirth Education classes have endeavored to familiarize expectant parents with the birth experience and their choices. The movement has brought about such things as father participation and rooming in within hospitals.

Alternative birth centers and services for home births have been made available. Professionals have often been reluctant to change or listen to lay people. Factions within childbirth education have different ideas.

Expectant parents have been caught in the middle. Medical practices which surround birth and babies have been questioned and attacked. Among these have been fetal heart monitors, unnecessary Caesarian deliveries, episiotomies, enemas, pubic shaves, and routine separation of mothers and infants. Somehow, circumcision of infant boys has been one of the last things for us to question. Infant circumcision was also a concurrent trend with some peculiar and uncompassionate practices in other aspects of infant care.

While the turn of the century advocates of circumcision did express concern over the obvious pain felt by infants undergoing this operation, later, as neonatal circumcision became increasingly widespread and routine within hospitals, the belief that infants feel no pain took over. Soon doctors became no more concerned about strapping the infant down, and clamping and slicing off his foreskin, than they were about cutting the umbilical cord. It seems absurd that such things should even be questioned or that there have to be organizations devoted to this!

It is now time to view infant circumcision as yet another vestige from an era that totally disregarded the needs and feelings of babies. Like other trends, circumcision has followed social and economic class lines. During the early decades of this century, upper and middle class parents were usually the first to have their babies in hospitals, to bottle feed their babies, and to have their infant sons circumcised.

Soon only the poorer, less educated people were not following these practices. Paradoxically, today parents with more education and higher incomes have been more likely to choose breastfeeding, to take classes in natural childbirth, to give birth at home or in alternative settings, and to leave their sons intact.

The s saw a reawakening to natural childbirth, father participation in birth, birth alternatives, and breastfeeding. Hopefully in the future we will see a similar reawakening to leaving our sons as they came into this world. Until neonatal circumcision became a common medical practice in the United States, Jews were one of the few peoples who circumcised infants. In other times and places this has brought ridicule and persecution upon the Jews. In the United States today, the Jew does not stand out as different for having a circumcised penis.

Have Jews been the cause, directly or indirectly, of the widespread popularity of routine infant circumcision in the United States? There are many Jewish doctors in the U. Has there been a conscious Jewish plot to deprive the rest of America of their foreskins? Their mission is to circumcise every Christian in the country….

The Jews try to judeify the Gentiles…. The writers who advocated neonatal circumcision during the late s, such as Remondino and Hutchinson, were not Jewish. Remondino, however, does expound at length about the high moral character and generally good health enjoyed by Jews, compared to other peoples, somehow concluding that all this is related to their lack of prepuces:.

Crimes against the person or property committed by Jews are rare. They likewise do not figure in either police courts or penitentiary records; they are not inmates of our poorhouses, but, what is also singular, they are never accused of many silly!

So that the Jew cannot be said to be a loser by his observance of this rite, and he and his race have been well repaid for all the sufferings and persecutions that its observance has subjected them to.

If the Jews indeed have been a healthier, longer-lived people than their Gentile counterparts, it seems more plausible that this could be attributed to their highly moral, regulated, and family oriented lifestyle, and their careful inspection of meats, rather than their lack of foreskins. There is no evidence that Jews have deliberately conspired to take away the foreskins of their Gentile brothers.

If infant circumcision had not been a part of our Judaeo-Christian heritage, it is highly doubtful that it would have ever been presented as a medical procedure. If suggested, the operation would have seemed strange and abhorrent. Once the practice was established, it is certainly understandable that most Jewish physicians would be in favor of routine infant circumcision. The Jewish practice of infant circumcision has been an indirect influence on the widespread medical fad.

We have made a false religion out of the medical profession. Doctors, however much they may enjoy their elevated status, must awaken and seek to change this as well. Medical procedures are not sacred rituals, but are often trial-and-error fads which frequently do fall into disfavor. In primitive societies the role of healer and priest was usually the same.

Attending the sick involved calling upon the gods, as well as dispensing medicines and treatments.

July 10, at am. Harissa as I have said before is very close to my heart. If you want to make a meal with it, place the tofu inside Pita or Naan, smeared with your favorite spread, fill in with some greens and wrap it up. Lovely pics as usual and yes its delicious and ridiculously easy when you pu t it that way. It will be a gift from one foodie to another. Good Point! Not sure where I went wrong.

Foreskin cutting slicing clamping extraordinary pain. Related Topics

.

The Foreskin Flap | Feature | Chicago Reader

No anesthetic is used. Meanwhile, Joseph is strapped down to a special mattress by a Reform mohel who injects an anesthetic into the base of his penis. During the following 10 minutes, the tip of his penis is covered by a bell-shaped clamp; the foreskin is sliced, pulled back over the clamp and cut off.

At such a young age, do Isaac or Joseph feel pain? And if so, how do their circumcisers feel about the pain they inflict? Are there moral issues in play here? Are some methods of circumcision more humane than others? As Europeans and some Americans debate the acceptability of circumcision, the question of pain has surfaced as one of the key reasons opponents cite to ban this ancient religious practice.

Those who perform Jewish ritual circumcision — brit milah — say they are concerned about pain, too, but have very different methods of minimizing it, depending on religious denomination. Proponents of circumcision were given a major boost in August, when the American Academy of Pediatrics released its revised guidelines on male circumcision , stressing the medical benefits of the procedure in reducing the incidence of urinary tract infections and sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV.

Physicians, a number of whom practice as Reform mohels, say there is no question that infants feel pain. First he secures the baby into a circumstraint, a foam board with straps to hold down arms and legs Lerman says he uses only the leg restraints.

After about 10 minutes, when the area is numb, he fits a device called a Gomco clamp over the penis. Over the next 10 minutes, he performs the procedure. Lerman could use a different device called a Mogen clamp, which is more commonly used by Orthodox mohels. Mogen clamps allow the circumciser to work faster, but they leave the head of the penis exposed. In that case, the botched operation was a secular procedure performed by a physician in a hospital. Because the Gomco clamp takes so long, many Orthodox mohels view the use of it as cruel.

They even oppose the injection of local anesthetic. Like many of his peers, the mohel, who did not wish to be named, uses a shield device inserted between the head of the penis and the foreskin. From start to finish, the operation is over in a few minutes. Because he is not a physician, the Orthodox mohel cannot inject anesthetic into the baby.

Instead, he can use an anesthetic cream, which he said he tries to avoid unless a parent demands it. It has been practiced for thousands of years with no ill effects, and we are comfortable taking that approach.

Of local anesthetic, Cantor Philip L. Sherman, like most Orthodox mohels, gives a baby concentrated sugar water before the procedure and kosher sweet wine or grape juice afterward. He said anesthetic creams are not designed for 8-day-old infants. The creams also make the surface of the penis greasy.

Both Orthodox mohels cited unnamed physicians, including anesthesiologists, pediatricians and pediatric urologists, who warned them off topical anesthetics. But, Wolpe added, perhaps people have become too sensitive to pain. Parents inflict all sorts of discomfort on their children, he said, from vaccinations to having cavities filled.

The transience of pain is particularly relevant with circumcision, which is performed when an infant is so young that it is not even clear what kind of pain the child experiences. Is it solely a reflexive pain that causes an emotional response but leaves no psychological aftereffects?

Or is it a more recognizable pain that embeds itself in the consciousness? At one extreme is the animalistic reflex to avoid a stimulus. Science has not been able to answer quite where circumcision falls on the pain-suffering spectrum. But with the AAP guidelines pointing more strongly toward the medical benefits of circumcision, science has made it a little easier to justify.

Contact Paul Berger at berger forward. Paul Berger was a staff writer at the Forward from , covering crime and healthcare issues, such as sex abuse, circumcision, and fraud. He is a fluent Russian speaker and has reported from Russia and Ukraine. He also likes digging into historical mysteries. Home Weighing Pain of Circumcision for Baby. Home Share Search. Email Facebook Twitter.

Give Advertise Subscribe. Courtesy of WNET. Paul Berger Paul Berger was a staff writer at the Forward from , covering crime and healthcare issues, such as sex abuse, circumcision, and fraud. J Goldberg. Send to. Add a message. Send me a copy. Thank you! This article has been sent!